![]() ![]() ( Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks has more information about this.) If there is significant doubt as to who copied whom, report the issue at Wikipedia:Copyright problems, but first check the apparent source carefully to see if states somewhere that the content was taken from Wikipedia.įAQs 1. Note also that an article may appear to have been copied from another source, but actually the other source copied from Wikipedia - sometimes without attribution. More detailed guidance can be found here. If you are unsure, or for some reason don't want to make the edit yourself, tag the article with the Close paraphrasing template or the Copypaste template (whichever is relevant). If you find closely paraphrased or pasted verbatim text in an article, remove it immediately and note this in the edit summary and on the article's talk page by adding the Cclean template. Other give-aways are peacock wording like "a fast rising star on the international opera scene" and clichés like "has sung under the baton of". Cipolla", etc., or the use of the subject's first name on its own. Does it read like a resumé, press release, or fan site? Typical signs of this in opera-related biographies are the use of honorifics, e.g.« » or slanted quote marks and apostrophes ? The latter are more easily seen when looking at the text in the editing box. Are there non-standard wiki characters e.g.For example, "a downward glissando breaks the spell, and the solo cello returns one last time, plaintively and prophetically." Is the text overly 'poetic' in parts? This often indicates pasting from a composer's or publisher's description of a work.Does the whole text (or parts of it) look almost too professional, polished and scholarly?.Was the original version of the article or section a large chunk of unformatted, un-wikified text?.Has the editor been churning out large numbers of non-stub articles in a short space of time?.There can be other explanations for any of the following alarm bells, but their presence often warrants closer scrutiny of the article: This will force you to write it in your own words - it's just too easy to be tempted to copy the pithy and perfect phrases that one frequently encounters in Grove articles.ĭealing with copyright violations.Now attempt a draft of the topic, just using your outline, preferably after not having looked at the Grove article for a little while.Then make an outline of the facts only (no adjectives no phrases just the facts, in chronological order if it is a biography or chronology otherwise applies.Make sure you understand the outline of the subject well enough to explain it verbally to another person without looking at the Grove. We're happy to help.Īntandrus has written some very useful advice for editors basing their articles on material from the Grove refererence works, but it applies to using any source: Just post a notice on our project's talk page. If your draft (or a section of it) is largely derived from a single source, ask for an experienced editor's opinion before going live with it. ![]() It can sometimes be difficult to view your work objectively concerning copyright issues, especially if you are new to Wikipedia. ![]() The pressure of trying to expand and refine 'on the hop' in a live article can lead to copyright disaster. You'll find help in setting up a draft page here. We recommend that you draft your article in your user space first. It also allows you the time to review your work carefully for potential copyright violations. This approach will result in more interesting and coherent content. It also helps to draft your article gradually rather than rushing to get it into Wikipedia. ![]() One of the best ways to avoid copyright violations (and to write a better article) is to use several sources rather than relying on a single reference work or web site. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |